The New Jersey State Senate unanimously voted Thursday to ban the so-called “pink tax” which detractors say forces girls to spend more cash on merchandise than their male counterparts.
The invoice, sponsored by Sens. Nia Gill, Linda Greenstein and Nellie Pou, would “prohibit gender-based discrimination with regards to product pricing,” the State Senate Democrats stated in an announcement. “Companies can be prohibited from charging totally different costs for any two client services or products which might be considerably related primarily based on the gender the services or products are marketed in the direction of.”
The senators argue that ladies, by their fiftieth birthday, may have spent a mean of $69,132 greater than a person for a similar items and providers.
“The ‘Pink Tax’ is just not solely unfair, however it promotes gender discrimination by forcing those that determine as feminine to pay extra for merchandise which might be usually indistinguishable from the identical items marketed in the direction of males,” stated Sen. Greenstein. “As a society, we’ve taken nice strides lately to shut the hole between genders, specializing in methods we are able to make the world a extra equal place. So long as the pink tax remains to be in existence, reaching gender equality will merely not be possible.”
Below the invoice, all companies, similar to tailors, barbers, hair salons, dry cleaners and laundromats, can be required to obviously confide in their prospects, in writing or on-line, the pricing for every of their customary providers. The invoice wouldn’t prohibit worth variations on the idea of labor, supplies, tariffs or another gender-neutral cause.
The invoice was accepted by the Senate with a vote of 35-0. A corresponding invoice remains to be in committee within the state meeting.